Security expert and Chulalongkorn University political scientist Panitan added yesterday that the intervention of "former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad as a broker in proposed peace talks to end the southern violence" was positive.

"But, I think if there are any peace talks between the Thai government and separatists, they should take place in a third country only," Panitan said.

He was responding to reports Malaysia was ready to host talks if requested.

According to Panitan, some northern states of Malaysia close to the Thai border had "close connections" with separatist groups.

"So, it would not be appropriate for talks to be organised in Malaysia." He did not identify the states.

"Malaysia and Mahathir could help by acting as supporting parties for the talks," Panitan suggested.

Prime Minister Surayud Chulanont will be in Malaysia next week as part of several whistle-stop visits to neighbouring nations.

Panitan said proposed talks with separatists would be on the agenda when Surayud meets Malaysian Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi and his ministers.

However, Panitan believed there would be no meeting with separatist leaders during the one-day trip because there was considerable groundwork to be done before talks could commence.

Malaysia's attempts to mediate with separatists had only started and there was much to be settled, he added.

Meanwhile, Ahmed Somboon Bualuang, a member of the former National Reconciliation Commission, said Malaysia had been accused of sheltering separatists and their leaders.

Its offer to mediate talks could be seen as an attempt to clear its name and emphasise its stand that it is opposed to violence in the South of Thailand.

"I have just returned from Malaysia. News that both sides are ready to talk has seen hope for peace to prevail," he said.

However, Surapong Ratchamukda, a leader of a Pattani Muslim association warned people not to be too hopeful about theproposed talks.

He said the Surayud was leading only an interim government and its priority was political reform. There may be little time to devote to Southern problems.

Moreover, there was no guarantee an elected government to follow would continue this administration's South policies.

The Nation